Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max
z-ai vs qwen
Verdict
On price, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.77× that of Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max).
On capability, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has the higher intelligence index (34) — better for complex reasoning.
Verdict: pick Z.ai: GLM 5.2 on a budget, or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 for output quality. Full details below.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Metric | Z.ai: GLM 5.2 | Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.01 | $1.48 |
| Output /1M | $6.80 | $4.42 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.70 | $2.21 |
| Context | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Intelligence | 34 | 30 |
| Coding | 69 | 66 |
| Math | — | — |
| Speed | 93 tok/s | 200 tok/s |
| CPS Grade | A | A |
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 details →Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max details →z-ai pricing →qwen pricing →← All comparisonsCheapest General LLMs APIs →Cheapest Text Processing APIs →
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 or Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max?
On price, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.77× that of Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max). Z.ai: GLM 5.2: $0.006 in / $6.8 out; Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max: $1.475 in / $4.425 out (per 1M tokens).
Which is smarter, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 or Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max?
On capability, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has the higher intelligence index (34) — better for complex reasoning. Coding index: Z.ai: GLM 5.2 69 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max 66.
Which one should I choose?
Verdict: pick Z.ai: GLM 5.2 on a budget, or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 for output quality. Full details below.