Z.ai: GLM 5.3 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash
z-ai vs inclusionai
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.27× that of Z.ai: GLM 5.3).
On capability, Z.ai: GLM 5.3 has the higher intelligence index (45) — better for complex reasoning.
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash on a budget, or Z.ai: GLM 5.3 for output quality. Full details below.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Metric | Z.ai: GLM 5.3 | inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.08 | $0.07 |
| Output /1M | $1.40 | $0.23 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.41 | $0.11 |
| Context | 1.0M | 262K |
| Intelligence | 45 | 41 |
| Coding | 75 | — |
| Math | — | — |
| Speed | 69 tok/s | 222 tok/s |
| CPS Grade | S | A |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Z.ai: GLM 5.3 or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash?
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.27× that of Z.ai: GLM 5.3). Z.ai: GLM 5.3: $0.079 in / $1.4 out; inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash: $0.075 in / $0.225 out (per 1M tokens).
Which is smarter, Z.ai: GLM 5.3 or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash?
On capability, Z.ai: GLM 5.3 has the higher intelligence index (45) — better for complex reasoning. Coding index: Z.ai: GLM 5.3 75 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash —.
Which one should I choose?
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash on a budget, or Z.ai: GLM 5.3 for output quality. Full details below.