OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
openai vs inclusionai
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.05× that of OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini).
On capability, OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has the higher intelligence index (20) — better for complex reasoning.
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash on a budget, or OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini for output quality. Full details below.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Metric | OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini | inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.25 | $0.02 |
| Output /1M | $2.00 | $0.06 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.69 | $0.03 |
| Context | 400K | 262K |
| Intelligence | 20 | 20 |
| Coding | 36 | 51 |
| Math | 92 | — |
| Speed | 174 tok/s | 308 tok/s |
| CPS Grade | A | A |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash?
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.05× that of OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini). OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini: $0.25 in / $2 out; inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash: $0.021 in / $0.063 out (per 1M tokens).
Which is smarter, OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash?
On capability, OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has the higher intelligence index (20) — better for complex reasoning. Coding index: OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 36 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash 51.
Which one should I choose?
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash on a budget, or OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini for output quality. Full details below.