Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash
google vs inclusionai
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.04× that of Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash).
On capability, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash has the higher intelligence index (41) — better for complex reasoning.
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash on a budget, or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash for output quality. Full details below.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Metric | Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash | inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.75 | $0.04 |
| Output /1M | $3.75 | $0.14 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.50 | $0.07 |
| Context | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Intelligence | 39 | 41 |
| Coding | 76 | — |
| Math | — | — |
| Speed | — | 102 tok/s |
| CPS Grade | A | A |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash?
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.04× that of Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash). Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash: $0.75 in / $3.75 out; inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash: $0.045 in / $0.135 out (per 1M tokens).
Which is smarter, Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash?
On capability, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash has the higher intelligence index (41) — better for complex reasoning. Coding index: Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash 76 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash —.
Which one should I choose?
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash on a budget, or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash for output quality. Full details below.